**Sequel of the preceding post The Warped Science of Interstellar (3/6)
**

In november 2014, the Hollywood blockbuster and science-fiction movie *Interstellar *was released on screens and much mediatic excitation arose about it.

This is the fourth of a series of 6 posts devoted to the analysis of some of the scientific aspects of the film, adapted from a paper I published last spring in Inference : International Review of Science.

**A HUGE TIME DILATION**

The elasticity of time is a major consequence of relativity theory, according to which time runs differently for two observers with a relative acceleration – or, from the Equivalence Principle, moving in gravitational fields of different intensities. This well-known phenomenon, checked experimentally to high accuracy, is called « time dilation ».

Thus, close to the event horizon of a black hole, where the gravitational field is huge, time dilation is also huge, because the clocks will be strongly slowed down compared to farther clocks. This is one of the most stunning elements of the scenario of *Interstellar* : on the water planet so close to Gargantua, it is claimed that 1 hour in the planet’s reference frame corresponds to 7 years in an observer’s reference frame far from the black hole (for instance on Earth). This corresponds to a time dilation factor of 60,000. Although the time dilation tends to infinity when a clock tends to the event horizon (this is precisely why no signal can leave it to reach any external observer), at first sight a time dilation as large as 60,000 seems impossible for a planet orbiting the black hole on a stable orbit.

As explained by Thorne in his popular book, such a large time dilation was a « non-negotiable » request of the film director, for the needs of the story. Intuitively, even an expert in general relativity would estimate impossible to reconcile an enormous time differential with a planet skimming up the event horizon and safely enduring the correspondingly enormous gravitational forces. However Thorne did a few hours of calculations and came to the conclusion that in fact it was marginally possible (although very unlikely). The key point is the black hole’s spin. A rotating black hole, described by the Kerr metric, behaves rather differently from a static one, described by the Schwarzschild metric. The time dilation equation derived from the Kerr metric takes the form:

1 – (dτ/dt)^{2} = 2GMr/c^{2}rho^{2}, where rho^{2} = r^{2} + (J/Mc)^{2}cos^{2}θ.

Substituting for dτ = 1 hour and dt = 7 years, one obtains the following relation:

This equation fully describes a black hole of mass M, rotating with angular momentum J, as observed by an observer at radial coordinate r and angular coordinate θ. The fraction on the right-hand-side fully depicts the 1 hour = 7 years dilation effect. For the Schwarzschild metric, the orbital radius should be no smaller than 3 times the gravitational radius, and such a time dilation could not be achieved for the planet of the film. But as already said, the Kerr metric allows for stable orbits much closer to the event horizon. Calculations indicate that for M = 10^{8} solar masses, we get r = 1.48×10^{13} cm, θ = π and J = 8.80275×10^{57} J.s. This implies a black hole angular momentum J extraordinarily close (at 10^{-10}) to the maximal possible value J_{max}, a circular orbit lying in the equatorial plane and a radius orbit practically equal to the black hole’s gravitational radius. All this is theoretically possible, but by no ways realistic.

**A CLEVER USE OF THE PENROSE PROCESS**

Another effect specific to the physics of rotating black holes, which was correctly depicted in *Interstellar*, is the Penrose process. The astronauts use it to benefit of a particularly efficient gravitational assistance (called « slingshot effect »), which allows their spaceship to plunge very close to the event horizon and escape with an increased energy. In effect, the laws of Kerr black hole physics say that, although a black hole prevents any radiation or matter from escaping, it can give up a part of its rotational energy to the external medium.

The key role is played by the *ergosphere*, a region between the event horizon and the static limit below which, like in a maelstrom, space-time itself is irresistibly dragged along with it (the so-called « Lense-Thirring effect »). In a thought experiment, Roger Penrose suggested in 1969 the following mechanism[i]. A projectile disintegrates into the ergosphere, one of the fragments falls into the event horizon in a direction opposite to the black hole’s rotation, while the other fragment can leave and be recovered, carrying more energy than the initial projectile. Replace the projectiles by a spaceship which leaves a part of it to fall into the black hole along a carefully chosen retrograde orbit, and *le tour est joué*.

The calculations indicate that one can extract an energy equivalent to the rest-mass energy of the part lost into the black hole, which, according to the famous formula E=mc^{2} can already be huge, plus an additional energy extracted from the spinning black hole, which has been slowed down by the infalling fragment in a retrograde orbit. For a black hole like Gargantua, rotating at almost the maximal speed, repeated Penrose processes could extract 29% of its mass.

**Go to next post The Warped Science of Interstellar (5/6)**

**REFERENCES**

[i] Penrose, R. : *Gravitational Collapse: the Role of General Relativity*, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, Numero Speziale 1, 252 (1969).

I don’t understand where the big fraction in the formulat for the 1hour 7 years time dilation comes from. 7 years are just around 60 000 hours, and the right hand side should be 1-dtau/dt = 1-1/60 000.

Could you elaborate?

The right hand side fraction is precisely equal to 1 – (dtau/dt)^2 (and not 1 – dtau/dt), which gives exactly dtau/dt = 1/60 000

Composition of the vector : Free fall

Vector of gravity and inertial force is possible to compose. It seems to show that the two are inviolable and non-interference each other (it will be the same on two gravity). It will be the same also on vector of gravity and inertial force that act at an optional point of an elevator cabin in free fall.

Sorry, I cannot receive E-mail. I do not have PC.

http://www.geocities.co.jp/Technopolis/2561/eng.html

Below is new URL of my web site.

http://life after death.vip/eng.html

Sorry, I made a mistake.

http://lifeafterdeath.vip/eng.html

Not realistic, you can say that again.

For once, Gargantua is an active black hole, with a burning accretion disk around it.

Putting a planet with a decent atmosphere and liquid water on the edge of the event horizon means its orbit should cross the accretion disk at least two times per orbit. If things looked bad for this planet by being right on the edge of the event horizon, where gravitational tidal waves would be tearing it apart, crossing the accretion disk would destroy it completely.

Time dilation

Ahead of us, plane waves of star light are coming from the left. Two space ships are passing each other (horizontally : at the same speed). How is difference of frequency of light observed by space ships explained ?

Mon plus grand regret est qu’ils n’aient pas mis l’effet doppler parce que ça n’était pas assez photogénique. Savez vous si il existe des visualisatioins de gargantua avec le doppler? Ensuite, que ce soit non réaliste, puisque l’univers est infini (ou cyclique 😉 ), ça ne me paraît pas impossible d’en trouver un qui remplisse les conditions.

Speed of Starlight

A glass cube is floating horizontally in outer space. Two rays of starlight coming from the left and right are passing through the glass horizontally. Below is the difference between the two rays of light as seen from viewpoint of the glass (difference in formula v = f λ).

Difference inside the glass c/n = c/n f ≠ f λ ≠ λ

Difference just before entering the glass c ≠ c f ≠ f λ = λ

Difference just after leaving the glass c = c f ≠ f λ ≠ λ

Speed of Light

The defined value of speed of light is based on measurements (with wavelength and frequency) done by Evenson et al. in 1973. Error is 1.1 m / s in pramai. Now measuring instrument is separated into a measuring part and a light source part. When one of them is moved at a constant speed higher than above error (in the direction of light path), different value will be obtained.

Speed of Starlight (Supplement)

Allow me to add to latest posts. When the glass cube moves left and right….

Inside the glass, c/n is constant, and the other two are variable

Just before entering the glass, λ is constant, and the other two are variable

Just after leaving the glass, c is constant, and the other two are variable