{"id":1636,"date":"2016-10-15T09:44:48","date_gmt":"2016-10-15T09:44:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/?p=1636"},"modified":"2016-10-20T18:14:47","modified_gmt":"2016-10-20T18:14:47","slug":"cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/","title":{"rendered":"Cosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sequel of the preceding post Cosmogenesis (8) : The Nebular Hypothesis<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Star<\/a>
Star Clusters and Nebulae. <\/strong>This page from “Telescopic views of Nebulae and Clusters by the Earl of Rosse and Sir J. Herschel” (1875) includes a variety of drawings of nebulosities by different observers. There are star clusters and gaseous nebulae (now known to belong to our own galaxy) as well as other galaxies. Observational techniques of the time were unable to distinguish between these very different types of objects.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In the first quarter of the 20th century cosmology became a distinct scientific discipline, thanks in part to the theoretical advance made in 1915 by Einstein with his theory of general relativity and in part to the revolution in observational techniques which revealed the true extent of the universe. Having at last been able to measure the distance of certain spiral nebulae, Edwin Hubble could confirm in 1925 that there existed other galaxies like our own.<\/p>\n

His colleague Vesto Slipher had previously discovered that the radiation from these galaxies was constantly shifting towards the red end of the optical spectrum, which suggested that they were moving away from us at great speed. This movement was not understood until scientists came to accept an idea based on the theory of general relativity and first proposed by Alexandre Friedmann in 1922 and independently Georges Lema\u00eetre in 1927: that space was constantly expanding and consequently increasing the distance between galaxies. This idea proved to be one of the most significant discoveries of the century[i]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Alexander<\/a>
Alexander Friedmann in 1922<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In an article which appeared in 1922, entitled “On the Curvature of Space<\/a><\/span>“, Friedmann took the step which Einstein had balked at: he abandoned the theory of a static universe, proposing a “dynamic” alternative in which space varied with time. For the first time the problem of the beginning and the end of the universe was couched in purely scientific terms. Friedmann suggested that the universe was several tens of billions of years old, much older than the earth (then estimated to be about one billion years old) or the oldest known celestial objects. It was a remarkable prediction, the most recent estimate for the age of the universe being between 10 and 20 billion years.<\/p>\n

In 1927, in a seminal article entitled “A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Increasing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extra-Galactic Nebulae<\/a><\/span>“, Lema\u00eetre explained the observations of Hubble and Slipher by interpreting them, within the context of general relativity, as manifestations of the expansion of the universe. This expansion was taking place uniformly across the entire universe (which might be finite or infinite), not outwards from a particular point (in this sense the often quoted analogy of a balloon being inflated is misleading). It was not a case of matter moving within a fixed geometric framework, but of the framework itself dilating, of the very “fabric” of space-time stretching.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>
The Birth of Space According to Lema\u00eetre<\/strong>. Having discovered, independently of Friedmann, that general relativity could apply to a non-static universe, Georges Lema\u00eetre developed two models which he believed could explain the “birth of space”. First he calculated how the universe would have evolved if it were homogeneous and isotropic. In the Lemaitre archive at Louvain is a diary containing a draft of his 1927 article as well as two unpublished diagrams showing the time evolution of the “cosmic scale factor” (a measure of the size of the universe as a function of time) depending on the value of the cosmological constant for all possible universes with positive curvature. In 1931 he proposed a second model, based on the primeval atom, in which space and time were born simultaneously. It is a variation of this model on which modern big bang theory is based. The last data on the Cosmic Microwave Background (Spring 2000) seem to favor such a Lema\u00eetre model with a positive cosmological constant (i.e., an ever-expanding space, at an accelerating rate).
Georges Lema\u00eetre, manuscripts, 1927, Louvain, University, Lema\u00eetre archive;<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In 1931 Lema\u00eetre dared to make an even more outrageous assumption: if the universe is expanding now, must it not have been much smaller and denser at some time in the past? Trying to find a link between nebulae and atoms he applied the latest knowledge about particles and radioactivity: “A comprehensive history of the universe ought to describe atoms in the same way as stars.” In the distant past the universe must have been so condensed that it was a single entity, a “primeval atom”, which Lemaitre envisaged as a “quantum”, referring to the then new discipline of quantum physics. “We might imagine that space began as a primeval atom and that the birth of space was also the birth of time.”<\/p>\n

\"primeval-atom\"<\/a>This idea was very poorly received by other scientists. The fact that Lema\u00eetre was a mathematician, allied to his religious convictions (he had been ordained as a priest in 1923), no doubt added to their natural resistance towards the instigation of a new world view. By 1950, when Lemaitre published a summary, in English, of his theory, entitled The Primeval Atom: An Essay on Cosmogony, <\/em>it was thoroughly unfashionable. Two years previously the rival theory of a “steady state” universe, supported principally by Thomas Gold in America and by Hermann Bondi and Fred Hoyle in Britain, had met with widespread acclaim. Their argument was that the universe had always been and would always be as it is now, that is was eternal and unchanging.<\/p>\n

Seldom charitable towards his scientific adversaries, Fred Hoyle made fun of Lema\u00eetre at a conference in Pasadena in 1960 by introducing him as “the big bang man”. The expression “big bang”, isolated from its pejorative context, became part of scientific parlance thanks to a Russian-born American physicist George Gamow, a former student of Alexander Friedmann. Hoyle therefore unwittingly played a major part in popularizing a theory he did not believe in; he even brought grist to the mill of big bang theory by helping to resolve the question why the universe contained so many chemical elements.<\/p>\n

\"Georges<\/a>
Georges Gamow<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Gamow predicted that vestiges of the early universe, much cooler than it had been then, would be detectable as a particular pattern of microwave radiation. Just such “background” radiation was detected in 1964 by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson. After half a century of rejection, Lemaitre’s primeval atom, in the guise of the catchphrase “big bang theory”, had at last been accepted by theoretical physicists.<\/p>\n

The so-called big bang models are based on observations and experiments whose results have been extrapolated as far as possible into the past (it is not possible to get back to the very beginning of the universe) and are constructed by a process of hypothesis and calculation – as is the rule in physics. No other kind of model corroborates as many observed phenomena as big bang theory.[ii]<\/a> Other theories, such as those of “tired light” and the “static universe”, have tried to compete with it and even to displace it (by inventing arbitrary laws of physics), but they have been contradicted by observation – particularly by that of background radiation. Only big bang theory, which is now almost universally accepted by astrophysicists, can satisfactorily explain the mass of observations made by the great telescopes and the results of experiments carried out in particle accelerators and retrace the principal stages in the creation of the universe – a process which took not six days but 14 billion years!<\/p>\n

\u00a0References<\/strong><\/p>\n

[i]<\/a> Essais de cosmologie, par A. Friedmann et G. Lema\u00eetre, pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9 de L’Invention du big bang,\u00a0<\/em> Le Seuil, coll. Sources du Savoir, Paris, 1997.<\/p>\n

[ii]<\/a> See An Introduction to Modern Cosmology, <\/em>A. Liddle (3rd ed.),<\/em> Wiley, 2015.<\/p>\n

****************************************************************<\/p>\n

Go to next and last post Cosmogenesis (9) : A Modern Account<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sequel of the preceding post Cosmogenesis (8) : The Nebular Hypothesis In the first quarter of the 20th century cosmology became a distinct scientific discipline, thanks in part to the theoretical advance made in 1915 by Einstein with his theory of general relativity and in part to the revolution in observational techniques which revealed the … Continue reading Cosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1810,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[198,14,27,4],"tags":[102,138,149,152,156,127,128,6],"class_list":["post-1636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-astronomy","category-history-of-science-epistemology","category-my-books-articles","category-sciences","tag-big-bang","tag-cosmology","tag-einstein","tag-friedmann","tag-gamow","tag-hubble","tag-lemaitre","tag-une"],"yoast_head":"\nCosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery, by Jean-Pierre Luminet<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery, by Jean-Pierre Luminet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sequel of the preceding post Cosmogenesis (8) : The Nebular Hypothesis In the first quarter of the 20th century cosmology became a distinct scientific discipline, thanks in part to the theoretical advance made in 1915 by Einstein with his theory of general relativity and in part to the revolution in observational techniques which revealed the … Continue reading Cosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery →\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"e-LUMINESCIENCES: the blog of Jean-Pierre Luminet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-10-15T09:44:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-20T18:14:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2016\/10\/Lemaitre-telescope.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"635\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jean-Pierre LUMINET\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jean-Pierre LUMINET\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/\",\"name\":\"Cosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery, by Jean-Pierre Luminet\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2016\/10\/Lemaitre-telescope.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-10-15T09:44:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-20T18:14:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#\/schema\/person\/d61f577b54398f0ecee81e140e7643cb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2016\/10\/Lemaitre-telescope.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2016\/10\/Lemaitre-telescope.jpg\",\"width\":844,\"height\":635,\"caption\":\"Georges Lema\u00eetre\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/\",\"name\":\"e-LUMINESCIENCES: the blog of Jean-Pierre Luminet\",\"description\":\"I felt dizzy and wept, for my eyes had seen that secret and conjectured object whose name is common to all men but which no man has looked upon -- the unimaginable universe. Jorge luis Borges, The Aleph (1949)\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#\/schema\/person\/d61f577b54398f0ecee81e140e7643cb\",\"name\":\"Jean-Pierre LUMINET\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a6d27645b8081b2f766677414e6a83e1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a6d27645b8081b2f766677414e6a83e1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jean-Pierre LUMINET\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/author\/jpluminet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery, by Jean-Pierre Luminet","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery, by Jean-Pierre Luminet","og_description":"Sequel of the preceding post Cosmogenesis (8) : The Nebular Hypothesis In the first quarter of the 20th century cosmology became a distinct scientific discipline, thanks in part to the theoretical advance made in 1915 by Einstein with his theory of general relativity and in part to the revolution in observational techniques which revealed the … Continue reading Cosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery →","og_url":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/","og_site_name":"e-LUMINESCIENCES: the blog of Jean-Pierre Luminet","article_published_time":"2016-10-15T09:44:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-20T18:14:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":844,"height":635,"url":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2016\/10\/Lemaitre-telescope.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Jean-Pierre LUMINET","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jean-Pierre LUMINET","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/","url":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/","name":"Cosmogenesis (9) : The Big Bang Discovery, by Jean-Pierre Luminet","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2016\/10\/Lemaitre-telescope.jpg","datePublished":"2016-10-15T09:44:48+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-20T18:14:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#\/schema\/person\/d61f577b54398f0ecee81e140e7643cb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/2016\/10\/15\/cosmogenesis-9-the-big-bang\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2016\/10\/Lemaitre-telescope.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/11\/2016\/10\/Lemaitre-telescope.jpg","width":844,"height":635,"caption":"Georges Lema\u00eetre"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/","name":"e-LUMINESCIENCES: the blog of Jean-Pierre Luminet","description":"I felt dizzy and wept, for my eyes had seen that secret and conjectured object whose name is common to all men but which no man has looked upon -- the unimaginable universe. Jorge luis Borges, The Aleph (1949)","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#\/schema\/person\/d61f577b54398f0ecee81e140e7643cb","name":"Jean-Pierre LUMINET","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a6d27645b8081b2f766677414e6a83e1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a6d27645b8081b2f766677414e6a83e1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jean-Pierre LUMINET"},"url":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/author\/jpluminet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1636"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1636\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1857,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1636\/revisions\/1857"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.futura-sciences.com\/e-luminet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}